Harvard University has been positioned as one of the most prestigious universities in our nation for generations. Our country’s first university has been educating the leaders of the free world since 1636, 140 years before the United States was even established as a nation. The list of Harvard’s alumni is vast and includes Nobel Peace Prize winners, innovators, world leaders and eight US presidents. It has broken ground in several fields like law, business and medicine. However, in less than two years, Harvard has tarnished its legacy and seems to have reached a point of no return.
Since October 7, 2023, Harvard has fallen into chaotic disarray. The focus on higher education has been swapped with destructive protests, occupations of campus buildings, hate chants and a startling rise in antisemitism. At face value, the movement spearheading these horrific events appears to be led by the students and is being carried out in the name of human rights. Both are untrue.
The minds behind the madness are the faculty. The individuals purposed with preparing students for a life of success and perseverance, are leveraging their influence and authority to spread and legitimize harmful ideologies aligned with US-designated terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah.
Harvard’s professors are at the forefront of a nationwide trend of student indoctrination.
Among Harvard’s revered staff are a handful of rogue professors who are amassing an army of manipulated student protestors. They are sidelining their lesson plans to spread Hamas rhetoric, encourage student participation in hate rallies and even offer them extra credit to do so. From behind the comforts of their desks, these men and women are sending students out to clash with police, get arrested and put their futures on the line. These violations of professional ethics are not protected under the banner of academic freedom.
Ajantha Subramanian, a professor of anthropology at Harvard University
Bram Wispelwey an Instructor in Medicine at Harvard Medical School and co-founder of Health for Palestine
Diana Buttu, a Palestinian-Canadian lawyer, media commentator, and current Harvard instructor
Dr. Karameh Kuemmerle, a Palestinian-American neurologist and assistant Professor of Neurology at Havard
Dr. Lara Jirmanus, a Lebanese-Palestinian medical professional and and clinical instructor at Harvard Medical School
Mary Travis Bassett, the Director of the FXB Center for Health and Human Rights at Harvard University.
Vijay Iyer, a Harvard professor and acclaimed composer
Walter Johnson, a tenured history professor at Harvard University
According to Harvard’s April 2025 report titled, “Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias”
Over the past two years, extremist ideologies, antisemitism and chaotic hate rallies at Harvard have simmered to a boiling point. Concern has reached every facet of American life, from the University itself to the entire state of Massachusetts and all the way to our politicians in Washington DC.
On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump responded to rising concerns by issuing two executive orders. One is titled, “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorist and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats,” which will open investigations on individuals suspected of spreading extremism on campus and act against them. The order empowers the federal government to identify and deport foreign aliens who glorify terrorism and incite social unrest. The second Executive Order takes disciplinary aim on extremists, including tenured professors, who take part in or spread antisemitism.
Harvard University’s spurt in antisemitism has been widely acknowledged by both faculty and students; however, the university’s leadership has yet to take any meaningful steps to extinguish the rising hostilities. In nearly two years, the lines between being Palestinian human rights and antisemitism have been blurred out of existence. Chanted at hate rallies and tagged across Harvard’s hallways have been a slew of antisemitic slogans, death threats to anyone supporting Jewish self-determination and homages to Hamas and Hezbollah, two groups responsible for killing thousands of innocent Jews throughout the last decades.
Harvard’s simmering hatred hasn’t only resulted in a campus divided and a fear of impending mockery and assault on the quad and in classrooms, it has cost the university hundreds of thousands of dollars in property damage. Windows have been broken, walls have been damaged by scraping or tagging, a number of statues have been vandalized, and on one occasion a flag display was destroyed. No student enrolling in America’s first institution of higher learning would expect to be happy in such an environment.
Harvard University is facing a federal investigation for alleged violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, centered on its failure to adequately address antisemitic harassment and discrimination on campus. The Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services are examining both the university’s response to campus antisemitism and race-based practices within entities like the Harvard Law Review. The investigation follows mounting complaints that Harvard allowed a hostile environment for Jewish students to persist, despite repeated warnings. Although the university reached a settlement with the Brandeis Center in early 2025, which included adopting the IHRA definition of antisemitism and promising reforms, federal agencies concluded that deeper structural failures warranted continued oversight and enforcement.
Harvard’s President Alan Garber initially followed the status quo of most universities and released a flurry of hollow statements regarding initiatives to combat antisemitism. It was merely performative language. As time passed, Garber’s true stance came to light, and he refused to comply with the Trump Administration’s plan to eradicate hate and extremism on campus. The very man who should stand as the biggest advocate for campus safety has become a shield for the very extremist students who are destroying it.
At Harvard, the rise in antisemitic rhetoric and hostile demonstrations has shattered the sense of safety once expected on campus. Jewish students and anyone opposing extremism report being harassed, threatened, and ostracized for expressing their identity or support for Israel. Faculty members have amplified extremist narratives, while administrators have stood by, issuing vague statements instead of taking decisive action. As protests escalated into occupations and targeted intimidation, Harvard’s campus ceased to be a space of academic freedom and became a breeding ground for fear and division.
Harvard’s global prestige has been deeply tarnished by its failure to confront antisemitism and uphold its own standards of integrity. Once a symbol of academic leadership, it is now mired in controversy, federal investigations, and public outrage. The university’s inaction—and its perceived tolerance of hate—has shaken confidence in its leadership and left a lasting mark on its reputation.
Harvard is facing an unprecedented financial reckoning. The Trump administration has frozen over $3.2 billion in federal research funding, barred the university from receiving new grants, and launched a review of its tax-exempt status. Major donors have withdrawn support, and the financial strain has already led to layoffs of researchers and cuts to key academic programs. For students, this means fewer resources, reduced opportunities, and a university in crisis.
At Harvard, the rise of political radicalism has begun to erode the core of academic excellence. Classrooms, once dedicated to rigorous inquiry, now serve as platforms for activism, with some faculty prioritizing ideology over scholarship. As biased narratives replace balanced education, Harvard’s credibility within the academic community—and its value to students—is rapidly deteriorating.
Harvard is at a crossroads. The institution that once shaped the brightest minds now shelters faculty who normalize antisemitism, embolden extremism, and twist education into indoctrination. Instead of protecting students, Harvard’s leadership has chosen silence—leaving Jewish students exposed, researchers abandoned, and its core values in shambles.
This is more than a campus issue—it’s a national crisis. Alumni, donors, lawmakers, and the public must demand accountability. Harvard’s legacy cannot survive on the name alone; it must be defended through action.